Chris Marshall's endorsement of the book "Justice and the Parables of Jesus" by Yung Suk Kim

The Manifesto of the Sovereign Nomad

Yung Suk Kim

I. The Great Refusal
We acknowledge the ache to belong, yet we refuse the price of entry. To belong entirely to a place, a person, or a dogma is to stop growing. We reject the comfort of the "Total Identity." We are not puzzles to be solved or slots to be filled. We are a process, and a process cannot be anchored.

II. The Sanctity of the Threshold
Our home is the Threshold. We exist in the doorway—half-in and half-out. From the threshold, we see more clearly than those deep inside the room. We claim the right to stand at the edge of every circle, participating with our whole hearts but keeping our feet ready to move.

III. Radical Presence, Zero Attachment
We believe in "The Deep Visit." When we are with you, we are fully there. We offer a presence that is rare because it is not obligated. We do not stay because we have nowhere else to go; we stay because we choose to. Our loyalty is to the moment, not to the institution.

IV. The Power of the "Outsider’s Eye"
By belonging nowhere, we become the bridge for everywhere. We speak the languages of many tribes but swear allegiance to none. This is our gift to the world: we see the patterns that those "inside" are too close to recognize. We are the critics, the witnesses, and the wanderers.

V. The Architecture of the Self
We do not seek a roof over our heads; we build a fire in our hearts. We realize that the "place" we have been looking for is not a coordinate on a map, but the internal space we carry with us. We are our own destination.

VI. The Vow
I will love the world, but I will not be owned by it.
I will seek my kin, but I will not lose my name.
I will belong to the journey, and the journey alone.

Emerson Powery's endorsement

Author's words

Most of us were taught that the parables are simple moral lessons. But what if they are actually radical blueprints for a just society? In this book, I challenge the stories we think we know to uncover the ten dimensions of justice Jesus was truly teaching. Whether you are a theology student, a social advocate, or simply seeking deeper meaning in scripture, this book, Justice and the Parables of Jesus, offers a transformative new perspective.

Endorsement by Jennifer Quigley

Endorsement by Demetrius Williams

Endorsement by James McGrath

Self-promotion time

COLLEAGUE

I enjoyed a pleasant conversation with my colleague, Dr. Robert Wafawanaka—a Hebrew Bible scholar—and presented him with a copy of my new book, Justice and the Parables of Jesus: Interpreting the Gospel Stories through Political Philosophy.

Hailing from Zimbabwe, Dr. Wafawanaka enriches biblical scholarship by drawing upon his African heritage and addressing issues of poverty and human welfare.

 

Vineyard Laborers

In Justice and the Parables of Jesus, Yung Suk Kim uses the Parable of the Vineyard Laborers (Matthew 20:1–16) to explore Distributive Justice. This is perhaps the most famous example of "unfairness" in the New Testament, but Kim argues that we only see it as unfair because we are looking through the wrong economic lens.

Redefining "Fair" through Distributive Justice
In a standard capitalistic or "merit-based" view, justice is proportional: you get paid exactly what your labor is worth. Kim shifts this to a needs-based framework of justice.

-The Problem of Joblessness: Kim points out that the workers standing in the marketplace all day weren't lazy; they were "unemployed" because no one had hired them. In the socio-political context of the time, a day's wage (one denarius) was the bare minimum needed to feed a family for one day.
-The "Daily Bread" Principle: By paying the one-hour workers the same as the twelve-hour workers, the landowner (representing God's rule) ensures that the latecomers' families do not starve.
-Atypical Economics: Kim describes the landowner as "atypical." He isn't driven by profit maximization (which would mean paying as little as possible) but by full employment and subsistence.

The "Evil Eye" of Comparison

Kim highlights the landowner’s response to the complaining workers: "Are you envious because I am generous?" (literally, "Is your eye evil because I am good?").

Kim argues that social comparison is a barrier to justice. When the "first" workers complain, they aren't actually losing anything—they received exactly what they agreed to. Their "suffering" is purely psychological, based on the fact that someone else received grace they didn't "earn." Kim posits that true distributive justice requires us to abandon the "culture of competition" and instead celebrate when the needs of the most vulnerable are met.